William P. Hetrick
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Brian F. O’DonnellAnantha ShekharChristine A. CarrollAmanda R. BolbeckerSteven G. PotkinWilliam E. BunneyYi JinMolly Erickson
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Music Perception (24 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaFrance
In The Last Decade
William P. Hetrick
33 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 426
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 227
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 218
- Social Psychology 133
Countries citing papers authored by William P. Hetrick
This map shows the geographic impact of William P. Hetrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William P. Hetrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William P. Hetrick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William P. Hetrick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William P. Hetrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William P. Hetrick. The network helps show where William P. Hetrick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William P. Hetrick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William P. Hetrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William P. Hetrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William P. Hetrick. William P. Hetrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 209 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 76 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 83 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 81 | |
| 17 | 105 | |
| 18 | 272 | |
| 19 | 73 | |
| 20 | 88 |
About William P. Hetrick
William P. Hetrick is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (24 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (426 citations) and Sensory Systems (91 citations). William P. Hetrick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Brian F. O’Donnell, Anantha Shekhar, Christine A. Carroll, Amanda R. Bolbecker, Steven G. Potkin, William E. Bunney, Yi Jin, Molly Erickson, Curt A. Sandman and Julie V. Patterson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and American Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.