Ann Oakley
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Joey SpragueAdam FletcherAngela HardenGinny BruntonHelen BurchettLauren B. AdamsonFelicity ClemensDiana Elbourne
- Topics
- Australian History and Society (1 paper)Sex and Gender in Healthcare (1 paper)Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ann Oakley
15 papers receiving 604 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Sociology and Political Science 304
- General Health Professions 213
- Education 128
- Gender Studies 115
- Clinical Psychology 94
Countries citing papers authored by Ann Oakley
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Oakley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Oakley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Oakley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Oakley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Oakley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Oakley. The network helps show where Ann Oakley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Oakley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Oakley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Oakley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Oakley. Ann Oakley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 192 | |
| 5 | Young people, pregnancy and social exclusion: A systematic synthesis of research evidence to identify effective, appropriate and promising approaches for prevention and support | 80 |
| 6 | Teenage Parenthood and Social Exclusion: A multi-method study | 19 |
| 7 | Integrating ‘qualitative’ studies and trials in reviews: reflections from reviews about teenage pregnancy, parenthood and social exclusion | 1 |
| 8 | The effect of various dimensions of social exclusion on young people’s risk of teenage pregnancy: Development of hypotheses from analysis of baseline data arising from a randomized trial of sex education | 8 |
| 9 | 326 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | Mothers and children in society. | 1 |
| 16 | 4 |
About Ann Oakley
Ann Oakley is a scholar working on Public Administration, Safety Research and History, having authored 16 papers that have together received 745 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (1 paper), Sex and Gender in Healthcare (1 paper) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (115 citations), Public Administration (38 citations) and General Health Professions (213 citations). Ann Oakley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joey Sprague, Adam Fletcher, Angela Harden, Ginny Brunton, Helen Burchett, Lauren B. Adamson, Felicity Clemens, Diana Elbourne, Mary Sawtell and Meg Wiggins. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.