Diana Elbourne

12 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Diana Elbourne
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 262
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 60
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 150
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 38
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 48
Replace Yasser Sami Amer with:
Yasser Sami Amer Saudi Arabia
Anne Lacey United Kingdom
Phil R. Manning United States
Olivier Grimaud France
Ainsley Moore Canada
Sue Ross United Kingdom
Lucile Turcot Canada
Joyce Kenkre United Kingdom
Nyokabi Musila United Kingdom
Chad Whelan United States
Diana Elbourne relative to Yasser Sami Amer Saudi Arabia Yasser Sami Amer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Yasser Sami Amer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Elbourne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Elbourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Elbourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Elbourne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Elbourne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Elbourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Elbourne. The network helps show where Diana Elbourne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana Elbourne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana Elbourne Line = papers co-authored together Diana Elbourne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 20182
2 201025
3 2007329
4 200779
5
Teenage Parenthood and Social Exclusion: a multi-method study: Summary report of findings
200516
6
Teenage Parenthood and Social Exclusion: A multi-method study
200519
7
Involving users in research: Report of focus group discussions with current and previous teenage mothers
20031
8 199960
9
The UK collaborative ECMO trial.
19944
10
Medical records. Holding the baby--and your notes.
19873
11
Booking for maternity care. A comparison of two systems.
19855
12 19856
13 198211

About Diana Elbourne

Diana Elbourne is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Health Information Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 13 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (1 paper), Maternal and fetal healthcare (1 paper), Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper) and Research in Social Sciences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (262 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (60 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (150 citations). Diana Elbourne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Jamaica. Frequent co-authors include Claire Snowdon, Rochelle Knight, Anthony M. Grant, Vikki Entwistle, David Francis, Alison McDonald, Ian Roberts, A. Grant, Marion Campbell and Jo Garcia. Their work appears in journals such as Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Adolescent Health and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026