Amélia M. Silva
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Pharmaceutical Science top 0.05%
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Biomaterials top 0.5%
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Eliana B. SoutoMaría L. GarcíaAntonello SantiniCarlos Martins‐GomesAlessandra DurazzoTatiana AndreaniAleksandra ZielińskaSlavomíra Doktorovová
- Topics
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (33 papers)Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (30 papers)Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (28 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Clinical InvestigationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
In The Last Decade
Amélia M. Silva
185 papers receiving 9.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
- Molecular Biology 2.4k
- Pharmaceutical Science 2.2k
- Food Science 1.6k
- Biomaterials 1.5k
- Materials Chemistry 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Amélia M. Silva
This map shows the geographic impact of Amélia M. Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amélia M. Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amélia M. Silva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amélia M. Silva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amélia M. Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amélia M. Silva. The network helps show where Amélia M. Silva may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amélia M. Silva
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amélia M. Silva. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amélia M. Silva based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amélia M. Silva. Amélia M. Silva is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 122 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 62 | |
| 20 | 37 |
About Amélia M. Silva
Amélia M. Silva is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Biochemistry and Food Science, having authored 190 papers that have together received 9.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (33 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (30 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (2.2k citations), Biochemistry (820 citations) and Biomaterials (1.5k citations). Amélia M. Silva has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Eliana B. Souto, María L. García, Antonello Santini, Carlos Martins‐Gomes, Alessandra Durazzo, Tatiana Andreani, Aleksandra Zielińska, Slavomíra Doktorovová, Joana F. Fangueiro and Patrícia Severino. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Clinical Investigation and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.