Amanda O’Hearn
Impact in
-
- Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Papers in
-
- Hearing Impairment and Communication 4
- Behavioral and Psychological Studies 1
-
- Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare 3
- Co-authors
- Robert Q. Pollard (3 shared papers)Michael McKee (1 shared paper)Peter C. Hauser (1 shared paper)Denise Thew (1 shared paper)Robyn K. Dean (1 shared paper)Steven Barnett (1 shared paper)Vincent J. Samar (1 shared paper)Erika Sutter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (1 paper)Contemporary Clinical Trials (1 paper)American Journal of Preventive Medicine (1 paper)Rehabilitation Psychology (1 paper)American annals of the deaf (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amanda O’Hearn
6 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 234
- Language and Linguistics 101
- General Health Professions 141
- Human-Computer Interaction 16
- Safety Research 20
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda O’Hearn
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda O’Hearn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda O’Hearn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda O’Hearn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda O’Hearn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda O’Hearn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda O’Hearn. The network helps show where Amanda O’Hearn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Amanda O’Hearn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 136 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 76 | |
| 3 | Deaf women's experiences and satisfaction with prenatal care: a comparative study. | 2007 | 40 |
| 4 | 2008 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 9 |
About Amanda O’Hearn
Amanda O’Hearn is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics, Clinical Psychology and Ophthalmology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (4 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (234 citations), Language and Linguistics (101 citations), General Health Professions (141 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (16 citations) and Safety Research (20 citations). Amanda O’Hearn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Q. Pollard, Michael McKee, Peter C. Hauser, Denise Thew, Robyn K. Dean, Steven Barnett, Vincent J. Samar, Erika Sutter, Thomas A. Pearson and Katherine White. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, Contemporary Clinical Trials, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Rehabilitation Psychology and American annals of the deaf.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.