Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

1.4k papers and 29.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice in the last decades have received a total of 29.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (316 papers) and Social Psychology (277 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (487 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (255 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (228 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice are Adrian Wells, Bárbara Stanley, Gregory K. Brown, Patrick W. Corrigan, Robert L. Leahy, David A. Moscovitch, Costas Papageorgiou, Steven C. Hayes, Michael P. Twohig and Philip C. Kendall.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive and Behavioral Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025