Contemporary Clinical Trials

2.9k papers and 48.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Contemporary Clinical Trials in the last decades have received a total of 48.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Clinical Trials usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (767 papers), General Health Professions (605 papers) and Statistics and Probability (446 papers) specifically the topics of Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (410 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (320 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (269 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Clinical Trials are Rebecca DerSimonian, Raghu N. Kacker, Nan M. Laird, James P. Hughes, Michael A. Hussey, Sergio Sismondo, Christine Grady, Suhail A.R. Doi, Jan J. Barendregt and Gail Williams.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Clinical Trials

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Clinical Trials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Clinical Trials.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Clinical Trials

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Clinical Trials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Clinical Trials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Clinical Trials more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025