Amanda E. Krause

1.8k citations
88 papers · 1.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

  • Music top 0.2%
    • Diverse Music Education Insights
    • Music History and Culture
    • Neuroscience and Music Perception

Papers in

Amanda E. Krause

79 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Amanda E. Krause
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Music 319
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 452
  • Social Psychology 343
  • Literature and Literary Theory 136
  • Communication 74
Replace Susan O’Neill with:
Susan O’Neill United Kingdom
Alexandra Lamont United Kingdom
Kari Kallinen Finland
Doris McIlwain Australia
Margaret S. Barrett Australia
Pamela Burnard United Kingdom
Dorothy Miell United Kingdom
Mark Grimshaw Denmark
Рена Упитис Canada
David Whitebread United Kingdom
Amanda E. Krause relative to Susan O’Neill United Kingdom Susan O’Neill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Susan O’Neill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda E. Krause

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda E. Krause's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda E. Krause with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda E. Krause more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda E. Krause

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda E. Krause. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda E. Krause. The network helps show where Amanda E. Krause may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda E. Krause, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda E. Krause Line = papers co-authored together Amanda E. Krause links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014113
2 201394
3 202170
4 201947
5 196843
6 201740
7 201633
8 201830
9 201430
10 202129
11 201429
12 201627
13 201424
14 198723
15 198520
16 201416
17 202015
18 201415
19 201914
20 201914

About Amanda E. Krause

Amanda E. Krause is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Music, Social Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (39 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (33 papers), Media Influence and Health (18 papers), Music Therapy and Health (15 papers), Flow Experience in Various Fields (7 papers), Music History and Culture (7 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (6 papers) and Music and Audio Processing (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (319 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (452 citations), Social Psychology (343 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (136 citations) and Communication (74 citations). Amanda E. Krause has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Adrian C. North, Jane W. Davidson, Lauren Y. Hewitt, Brody Heritage, James A. Dimmock, Ben Jackson, Amanda L. Rebar, Juyoung Lee, Steven Brown and David J. Hargreaves. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Music, Music & Science, Frontiers in Psychology, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts and Musicae Scientiae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact