Countries where authors publish in Music & Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Music & Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Music & Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Music & Science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Music & Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Music & Science.
About Music & Science
The 247 papers published in Music & Science in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Music & Science usually cover Music (114 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (193 papers), Signal Processing (60 papers), Social Psychology (91 papers) and Developmental Biology (8 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Music Perception (179 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (96 papers), Music Therapy and Health (66 papers), Music and Audio Processing (59 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (34 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (28 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (24 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Music & Science are Suvi Saarikallio, Daisy Fancourt, Tuomas Eerola, Rosie Perkins, Michael H. Thaut, Thenille Braun Janzen, Beatriz Ilari, Zachary Wallmark, Anton Killin and Miriam Lense.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.