Amanda D. Angie

484 total citations
7 papers, 355 citations indexed

About

Amanda D. Angie is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda D. Angie has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 355 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Social Psychology, 3 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Amanda D. Angie's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). Amanda D. Angie is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). Amanda D. Angie collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Amanda D. Angie's co-authors include Shane Connelly, Ethan P. Waples, Vykinta Kligyte, Samuel T. Hunter, Katrina E. Bedell, Michael D. Mumford, Dawn L. Eubanks, Katrina E. Bedell‐Avers, Michael G. Hughes and Cristina L. Byrne and has published in prestigious journals such as The Leadership Quarterly, Cognition & Emotion and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Amanda D. Angie

7 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amanda D. Angie United States	7	129	99	59	54	48	7	355
Mustapha Achoui Taiwan	6	204 1.6×	143 1.4×	81 1.4×	26 0.5×	34 0.7×	8	368
Beth A. Pontari United States	9	161 1.2×	185 1.9×	39 0.7×	48 0.9×	53 1.1×	14	363
Vykinta Kligyte United States	6	132 1.0×	76 0.8×	39 0.7×	125 2.3×	48 1.0×	7	453
Kylie Rochford United States	10	106 0.8×	47 0.5×	96 1.6×	60 1.1×	47 1.0×	19	341
Joseph Marks United Kingdom	6	85 0.7×	94 0.9×	21 0.4×	41 0.8×	55 1.1×	8	345
John Rijsman Netherlands	9	126 1.0×	134 1.4×	60 1.0×	25 0.5×	32 0.7×	19	277
Sylvester Taylor United States	9	150 1.2×	132 1.3×	126 2.1×	23 0.4×	51 1.1×	21	408
Deshani B. Ganegoda Australia	9	114 0.9×	101 1.0×	165 2.8×	43 0.8×	27 0.6×	15	307
Jennifer Mencl United States	7	108 0.8×	77 0.8×	171 2.9×	63 1.2×	20 0.4×	9	417
Adi Amit Israel	9	160 1.2×	199 2.0×	62 1.1×	41 0.8×	25 0.5×	21	372

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda D. Angie

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda D. Angie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda D. Angie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda D. Angie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda D. Angie

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda D. Angie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda D. Angie. The network helps show where Amanda D. Angie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda D. Angie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda D. Angie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda D. Angie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda D. Angie. Amanda D. Angie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Byrne, Cristina L., J. D. Barrett, Michael G. Hughes, et al.. (2013). Online Ideology: A Comparison of Website Communication and Media Use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 18(2). 25–39. 15 indexed citations

2.

Angie, Amanda D., Shane Connelly, Ethan P. Waples, & Vykinta Kligyte. (2011). The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Cognition & Emotion. 25(8). 1393–1422. 208 indexed citations

3.

Angie, Amanda D., Cristina L. Byrne, Gregory A. Ruark, et al.. (2011). Studying Ideological Groups Online: Identification and Assessment of Risk Factors for Violence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 41(3). 627–657. 23 indexed citations

4.

Bedell‐Avers, Katrina E., Samuel T. Hunter, Amanda D. Angie, Dawn L. Eubanks, & Michael D. Mumford. (2009). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: An examination of leader–leader interactions. The Leadership Quarterly. 20(3). 299–315. 33 indexed citations

5.

Bedell, Katrina E., et al.. (2006). A Historiometric Examination of Machiavellianism and a New Taxonomy of Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 12(4). 50–72. 42 indexed citations

6.

Angie, Amanda D., et al.. (2006). Extraversion and task performance: A fresh look through the workload history lens. Journal of Research in Personality. 40(4). 432–439. 19 indexed citations

7.

Angie, Amanda D., et al.. (2005). The effects of workload history on dual task performance. Current Psychology. 24(3). 171–179. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact