Cognition & Emotion

2.9k papers and 146.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Cognition & Emotion in the last decades have received a total of 146.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognition & Emotion usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k papers) and Social Psychology (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (738 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (634 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (501 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognition & Emotion are Paul Ekman, Dacher Keltner, James J. Gross, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Richard J. Davidson, Robert W. Levenson, Klaus R. Scherer, Michael W. Eysenck, Nico H. Frijda and Jonathan Haidt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognition & Emotion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognition & Emotion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognition & Emotion.

Countries where authors publish in Cognition & Emotion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognition & Emotion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognition & Emotion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognition & Emotion more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025