Cognition & Emotion

3.0k papers and 160.8k indexed citations

About

The 3.0k papers published in Cognition & Emotion in the last decades have received a total of 160.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognition & Emotion usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k papers) and Social Psychology (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (742 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (641 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (505 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognition & Emotion are Paul Ekman, Dacher Keltner, James J. Gross, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Robert W. Levenson, Klaus R. Scherer, Richard J. Davidson, Nico H. Frijda, Jonathan Haidt and Ira J. Roseman.

In The Last Decade

Cognition & Emotion

2.8k papers receiving 150.4k citations

Countries where authors publish in Cognition & Emotion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognition & Emotion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognition & Emotion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognition & Emotion more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Cognition & Emotion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognition & Emotion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognition & Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026