Allison E. Drew

949 citations
22 papers · 661 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Allison E. Drew

22 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

Allison E. Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Molecular Biology 444
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 111
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 68
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 94
  • Insect Science 55
Replace Yasuo Mukai with:
Yasuo Mukai Japan
Louise M. McKenzie Australia
Emily E. Hare United States
Jesper Brohede Sweden
Paulo Flávio Silveira Brazil
Virginie Vervoort United States
Massimiliano Delpero Italy
Caroline Bacquet Ecuador
Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder United States
John M. Peters United States
Allison E. Drew relative to Yasuo Mukai Japan Yasuo Mukai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Yasuo Mukai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Allison E. Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison E. Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison E. Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison E. Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison E. Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison E. Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison E. Drew. The network helps show where Allison E. Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Allison E. Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Allison E. Drew Line = papers co-authored together Allison E. Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017127
2 201595
3 200073
4 200073
5 201752
6 200044
7 201238
8 200036
9 201532
10 200122
11 200320
12 201210
13 20058
14 20058
15 20115
16 20004
17 20114
18 20153
19 20173
20 20182

About Allison E. Drew

Allison E. Drew is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related gene regulation (8 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (5 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (4 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (444 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (111 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (68 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (94 citations) and Insect Science (55 citations). Allison E. Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Linda L. Werling, Charles F. Williams, Scott Ribich, Robert A. Copeland, J. Joshua Smith, Richard Chesworth, Melissa J. Merrick, Rosemary J. Smith, Heike Keilhack and Sarah K. Knutson. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, Environmental Entomology, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters and SLAS DISCOVERY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact