Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder

978 total citations
27 papers, 709 citations indexed

About

Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 709 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Cell Biology and 5 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder's work include Congenital heart defects research (14 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (11 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (3 papers). Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder is often cited by papers focused on Congenital heart defects research (14 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (11 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (3 papers). Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder's co-authors include Michael Dush, Cris C. Ledón-Rettig, David W. Pfennig, Jeffrey A. Yoder, Alexander Deiters, Hrvoje Lusic, Jeane M. Govan, Mandy Womble, Clifford J. Tabin and Nicole A. Theodosiou and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Development and Journal of Cell Science.

In The Last Decade

Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder

27 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder United States 16 397 134 111 90 82 27 709
Erin Jarvis United States 16 498 1.3× 115 0.9× 36 0.3× 69 0.8× 102 1.2× 25 953
Małgorzata Daczewska Poland 17 459 1.2× 86 0.6× 98 0.9× 108 1.2× 39 0.5× 54 841
Günter Kamp Germany 18 244 0.6× 154 1.1× 49 0.4× 28 0.3× 25 0.3× 29 755
R. D. Zinovieva Russia 16 727 1.8× 111 0.8× 128 1.2× 126 1.4× 24 0.3× 28 898
Ashley E.E. Bruce Canada 20 674 1.7× 116 0.9× 406 3.7× 59 0.7× 11 0.1× 29 1.0k
Frédéric Sohm France 14 551 1.4× 276 2.1× 216 1.9× 55 0.6× 14 0.2× 19 1.1k
Sally F. Burn United Kingdom 8 371 0.9× 149 1.1× 112 1.0× 41 0.5× 11 0.1× 9 551
Eduardo Rosa‐Molinar United States 13 295 0.7× 89 0.7× 40 0.4× 100 1.1× 15 0.2× 28 616
Ildikó Somorjai United Kingdom 16 611 1.5× 114 0.9× 81 0.7× 86 1.0× 11 0.1× 31 909
Steven Harvey United Kingdom 9 566 1.4× 140 1.0× 273 2.5× 32 0.4× 15 0.2× 26 912

Countries citing papers authored by Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder. The network helps show where Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder. Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chiu, Yu‐Chun, et al.. (2024). Developmental regulation of cellular metabolism is required for intestinal elongation and rotation. Development. 151(4). 1 indexed citations
2.
Nascone‐Yoder, Nanette M., et al.. (2024). Morphoelastic models discriminate between different mechanisms of left-right asymmetric stomach morphogenesis. PubMed. 177. 203902–203902. 1 indexed citations
3.
Nascone‐Yoder, Nanette M., et al.. (2020). The twists and turns of left-right asymmetric gut morphogenesis. Development. 147(19). 8 indexed citations
4.
Womble, Mandy, Nirav M. Amin, & Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder. (2018). The left-right asymmetry of liver lobation is generated by Pitx2c-mediated asymmetries in the hepatic diverticulum. Developmental Biology. 439(2). 80–91. 9 indexed citations
5.
Amin, Nirav M., et al.. (2017). Stomach curvature is generated by left-right asymmetric gut morphogenesis. Development. 144(8). 1477–1483. 18 indexed citations
6.
Womble, Mandy, et al.. (2016). Frogs as integrative models for understanding digestive organ development and evolution. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology. 51. 92–105. 15 indexed citations
7.
Amin, Nirav M., et al.. (2015). Budgett's frog (Lepidobatrachus laevis): A new amphibian embryo for developmental biology. Developmental Biology. 405(2). 291–303. 12 indexed citations
8.
Stern, Joshua A., et al.. (2014). A single codon insertion in PICALM is associated with development of familial subvalvular aortic stenosis in Newfoundland dogs. Human Genetics. 133(9). 1139–1148. 12 indexed citations
9.
Marcot, Jonathan D., et al.. (2013). CONSTRAINTS ON MAMMALIAN FORELIMB DEVELOPMENT: INSIGHTS FROM DEVELOPMENTAL DISPARITY. Evolution. 67(12). 3645–3652. 8 indexed citations
10.
Dush, Michael & Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder. (2013). Jun N-terminal kinase maintains tissue integrity during cell rearrangement in the gut. Journal of Cell Science. 126(7). e1–e1. 7 indexed citations
11.
Ledón-Rettig, Cris C., et al.. (2013). Developmental origins of a novel gut morphology in frogs. Evolution & Development. 15(3). 213–223. 26 indexed citations
12.
Dush, Michael, Andrew L. McIver, Douglas D. Young, et al.. (2011). Heterotaxin: A TGF-β Signaling Inhibitor Identified in a Multi-Phenotype Profiling Screen in Xenopus Embryos. Chemistry & Biology. 18(2). 252–263. 16 indexed citations
13.
Nascone‐Yoder, Nanette M., et al.. (2010). Direct activation of Shroom3 transcription by Pitx proteins drives epithelial morphogenesis in the developing gut. Development. 137(8). 1339–1349. 45 indexed citations
14.
Deiters, Alexander, et al.. (2010). Photocaged Morpholino Oligomers for the Light-Regulation of Gene Function in Zebrafish and Xenopus Embryos. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 132(44). 15644–15650. 106 indexed citations
15.
Reed, Rachel, et al.. (2009). Morphogenesis of the primitive gut tube is generated by Rho/ROCK/myosin II–mediated endoderm rearrangements. Developmental Dynamics. 238(12). 3111–3125. 40 indexed citations
16.
Ledón-Rettig, Cris C., David W. Pfennig, & Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder. (2008). Ancestral variation and the potential for genetic accommodation in larval amphibians: implications for the evolution of novel feeding strategies. Evolution & Development. 10(3). 316–325. 78 indexed citations
17.
Schmitt, Christopher A., et al.. (2006). Role for retinoid signaling in left–right asymmetric digestive organ morphogenesis. Developmental Dynamics. 235(8). 2266–2275. 24 indexed citations
18.
Muller, Jennifer K., et al.. (2003). Left–right asymmetric morphogenesis in the Xenopus digestive system. Developmental Dynamics. 228(4). 672–682. 29 indexed citations
19.
Nascone‐Yoder, Nanette M., et al.. (2003). Left and right contributions to the Xenopus heart: implications for asymmetric morphogenesis. Development Genes and Evolution. 213(8). 390–398. 21 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Devyn M., et al.. (2000). Evolutionary relationships between the amphibian, avian, and mammalian stomachs. Evolution & Development. 2(6). 348–359. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erin Jarvis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Małgorzata Daczewska Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Günter Kamp Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. D. Zinovieva Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ashley E.E. Bruce Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Frédéric Sohm Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sally F. Burn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eduardo Rosa‐Molinar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ildikó Somorjai Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Steven Harvey
Rankless by CCL
2026