Charles F. Williams

1.3k total citations
28 papers, 917 citations indexed

About

Charles F. Williams is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles F. Williams has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 917 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 12 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Charles F. Williams's work include Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers). Charles F. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers). Charles F. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Charles F. Williams's co-authors include Theodore H. Fleming, Raymond P. Guries, Jeffrey P. Hill, Lila Fishman, Paul M. Beardsley, Angela Stathos, Allison E. Drew, Frank J. Bonaccorso, Purna C. Datta and Jennifer L. Barron and has published in prestigious journals such as New Phytologist, Evolution and Journal of Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Charles F. Williams

27 papers receiving 843 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Charles F. Williams United States 18 532 328 278 218 215 28 917
Craig Newton Canada 14 230 0.4× 226 0.7× 98 0.4× 237 1.1× 258 1.2× 23 762
Antonio González‐Rodríguez Mexico 12 191 0.4× 252 0.8× 114 0.4× 95 0.4× 152 0.7× 30 561
María Clara Castellanos Spain 20 1.3k 2.4× 896 2.7× 625 2.2× 288 1.3× 182 0.8× 39 1.5k
Kensuke Yoshimura Japan 19 303 0.6× 486 1.5× 69 0.2× 550 2.5× 378 1.8× 43 1.2k
Carol A. Rowe United States 10 175 0.3× 201 0.6× 179 0.6× 166 0.8× 127 0.6× 15 642
W. P. Byrd United States 4 304 0.6× 402 1.2× 147 0.5× 125 0.6× 632 2.9× 8 1.3k
Mirre J. P. Simons United Kingdom 20 498 0.9× 77 0.2× 68 0.2× 143 0.7× 140 0.7× 49 1.3k
Patricia Berger United States 20 312 0.6× 233 0.7× 211 0.8× 221 1.0× 158 0.7× 36 1.2k
O. E. Lazebny Russia 15 256 0.5× 94 0.3× 30 0.1× 172 0.8× 408 1.9× 70 953
Clifton Lee Gass Canada 19 688 1.3× 197 0.6× 260 0.9× 45 0.2× 79 0.4× 24 952

Countries citing papers authored by Charles F. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles F. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles F. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles F. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles F. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles F. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles F. Williams. The network helps show where Charles F. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles F. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles F. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles F. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles F. Williams. Charles F. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Whitney, Kenneth D., et al.. (2020). Birds Perceive More Intraspecific Color Variation in Bird-Pollinated Than Bee-Pollinated Flowers. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11. 590347–590347. 5 indexed citations
2.
Gray, Michelle A., et al.. (2018). Consistent shifts in pollinator‐relevant floral coloration along Rocky Mountain elevation gradients. Journal of Ecology. 106(5). 1910–1924. 21 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Charles F., et al.. (2016). Sixty-Five Years of Change in Montane Plant Communities in Western Colorado, U.S.A.. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research. 48(4). 703–722. 17 indexed citations
4.
Fishman, Lila, Paul M. Beardsley, Angela Stathos, Charles F. Williams, & Jeffrey P. Hill. (2014). The genetic architecture of traits associated with the evolution of self‐pollination in Mimulus. New Phytologist. 205(2). 907–917. 37 indexed citations
5.
Noe, Carl & Charles F. Williams. (2012). The benefits of interdisciplinary pain management.. PubMed. 61(4 Suppl). S12–6. 4 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Charles F., et al.. (2011). Obscenity and the Limits of Liberalism. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University). 1 indexed citations
7.
Thomas, D. Travis, et al.. (2008). Genetic Analysis of a Broad Hybrid Zone inAesculus(Sapindaceae): Is There Evidence of Long‐Distance Pollen Dispersal?. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 169(5). 647–657. 15 indexed citations
8.
Pearl, Christopher A., David S. Pilliod, Peter P. Sheridan, et al.. (2008). Saprolegniaceae identified on amphibian eggs throughout the Pacific Northwest, USA, by internal transcribed spacer sequences and phylogenetic analysis. Mycologia. 100(2). 171–180. 16 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Charles F.. (2007). Effects of floral display size and biparental inbreeding on outcrossing rates in Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany. 94(10). 1696–1705. 47 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Charles F., et al.. (2005). The Shadow War. Social Education. 69(5). 250. 3 indexed citations
11.
Keeler, Kathleen H., et al.. (2002). Clone Size of Andropogon gerardii Vitman (Big Bluestem) at Konza Prairie, Kansas. The American Midland Naturalist. 147(2). 295–304. 17 indexed citations
12.
Williams, Charles F., et al.. (2000). School Voucher Plans Raise Key Church-State Issues. Looking at the Law.. Social Education. 64(1). 56–62. 1 indexed citations
13.
14.
Binns, Falmai, Stanley M. Roberts, A. Taylor, & Charles F. Williams. (1993). Enzymic polymerisation of an unactivated diol/diacid system. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1. 899–899. 45 indexed citations
15.
Fleming, Theodore H. & Charles F. Williams. (1990). Phenology, seed dispersal, and recruitment inCecropia peltata(Moraceae) in Costa Rican tropical dry forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 6(2). 163–178. 81 indexed citations
16.
Mock, Douglas W., et al.. (1987). Flexibility in the development of heron sibling aggression: an intraspecific test of the prey-size hypothesis. Animal Behaviour. 35(5). 1386–1393. 27 indexed citations
17.
Williams, Charles F.. (1986). Social Organization of the Bat,Carollia perspicillata(Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Ethology. 71(4). 265–282. 55 indexed citations
18.
Fleming, Theodore H., et al.. (1985). PHENOLOGY, SEED DISPERSAL, AND COLONIZATION IN MUNTINGIA CALABURA, A NEOTROPICAL PIONEER TREE. American Journal of Botany. 72(3). 383–391. 59 indexed citations
19.
Sandman, Curt A., Purna C. Datta, Jennifer L. Barron, et al.. (1983). Naloxone attenuates self-abusive behavior in developmentally disabled clients. Applied Research in Mental Retardation. 4(1). 5–11. 79 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Charles F. & Donald J. Niederpruem. (1968). Trehalase in Schizophyllum commune. Archives of Microbiology. 60(4). 377–383. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026