Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Alan Wilson Alan Wilson (= 1×)
peers
Russell Abratt
Countries citing papers authored by Alan Wilson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Wilson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Wilson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Wilson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Wilson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Wilson. The network helps show where Alan Wilson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alan Wilson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alan Wilson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alan Wilson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alan Wilson. Alan Wilson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Azzopardi, Leif, et al.. (2019). VES Team at TREC Conversational Assistance Track (CAsT) 2019.. Text REtrieval Conference.1 indexed citations
5.
Wilson, Alan, et al.. (2016). The democratisation of expertise. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).
Wilson, Alan, Valarie A. Zeithaml, & Mary Jo Bitner. (2012). Services Marketing : Integrating Customer Focus Across The Firm european edition Ed. 2.56 indexed citations
8.
Radomir, Lăcrămioara, et al.. (2011). IMPROVING BANK QUALITY DIMENSIONS TO INCREASE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.8 indexed citations
9.
Wilson, Alan. (2010). Throwing sheep in the boardroom: how online social networking will transform your life, work and world. International Journal of Market Research. 52(3). 406–408.4 indexed citations
10.
Wilson, Alan. (2009). Marketing research: critical perspectives on business and management. International Journal of Market Research. 51(6). 843–843.1 indexed citations
Wilson, Alan, et al.. (2008). Services marketing: 1st European edition. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).7 indexed citations
13.
Wilson, Alan. (2006). Marketing research: an integrated approach 2nd edition. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).12 indexed citations
14.
Wilson, Alan. (2002). Satisfaction criteria of short-break leisure travellers.. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde). 4(4). 32–36.2 indexed citations
Kempf, James & Alan Wilson. (1993). Supporting mobile, pen-based computing with X: mobile information for hi-tech nomads. 203–211.2 indexed citations
20.
Wilson, Alan. (1992). The changing nature of the marketing function within retail banks and building societies. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.