A.J. Kleinheksel

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 771 citations indexed

About

A.J. Kleinheksel is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, A.J. Kleinheksel has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 771 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in Physiology and 8 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in A.J. Kleinheksel's work include Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (10 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers). A.J. Kleinheksel is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (10 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers). A.J. Kleinheksel collaborates with scholars based in United States and India. A.J. Kleinheksel's co-authors include Tasha R. Wyatt, Huda E. Tawfik, Nicole Rockich‐Winston, Celeste M. Alfes, Joseph T. Samosky, Parvati Dev, John M. OʼDonnell, Douglas A. Nelson, Cynthia Foronda and Yulia A. Strekalova and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Computers & Education.

In The Last Decade

A.J. Kleinheksel

18 papers receiving 741 citations

Hit Papers

Demystifying Content Analysis 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A.J. Kleinheksel United States 10 163 157 127 122 101 19 771
Javier Sanz‐Valero Spain 18 208 1.3× 277 1.8× 157 1.2× 68 0.6× 115 1.1× 181 1.3k
Farideh Yaghmaie Iran 9 141 0.9× 154 1.0× 53 0.4× 146 1.2× 98 1.0× 36 825
Neneh Rowa‐Dewar United Kingdom 13 199 1.2× 257 1.6× 116 0.9× 60 0.5× 145 1.4× 26 835
Daniel McLinden United States 15 83 0.5× 202 1.3× 85 0.7× 73 0.6× 88 0.9× 36 751
Anne Moen Norway 18 250 1.5× 383 2.4× 94 0.7× 79 0.6× 88 0.9× 113 1.2k
Juan Carlos Valderrama‐Zurián Spain 19 146 0.9× 153 1.0× 51 0.4× 55 0.5× 138 1.4× 144 1.4k
Scott R. Rosas United States 16 207 1.3× 481 3.1× 117 0.9× 106 0.9× 189 1.9× 45 1.2k
Emma Norris United Kingdom 16 339 2.1× 218 1.4× 295 2.3× 126 1.0× 129 1.3× 52 1.1k
Jeff Breckon United Kingdom 17 248 1.5× 277 1.8× 274 2.2× 79 0.6× 174 1.7× 58 1.1k
Ylona Chun Tie Australia 8 217 1.3× 269 1.7× 37 0.3× 137 1.1× 234 2.3× 11 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by A.J. Kleinheksel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.J. Kleinheksel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.J. Kleinheksel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.J. Kleinheksel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.J. Kleinheksel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.J. Kleinheksel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.J. Kleinheksel. The network helps show where A.J. Kleinheksel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.J. Kleinheksel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.J. Kleinheksel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.J. Kleinheksel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.J. Kleinheksel. A.J. Kleinheksel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Kleinheksel, A.J., et al.. (2024). Evaluating facilitator adherence to a newly adopted simulation debriefing framework. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(1). 71–75.
2.
Tews, Matthew, et al.. (2024). A Comparison of Two Debriefing Rubrics to Assess Facilitator Adherence to the PEARLS Debriefing Framework. Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 19(6). 358–366. 2 indexed citations
3.
Seehusen, Dean A., et al.. (2023). The Power of One Word to Paint a Halo or a Horn: Demonstrating the Halo Effect in Learner Handover and Subsequent Evaluation. Academic Medicine. 98(8). 929–933. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kleinheksel, A.J., et al.. (2022). Leveraging Medical Simulation for Faculty Development in Interprofessional Education: A Pilot Study.. PubMed. 51(1). 3–8. 1 indexed citations
6.
Chen, Weichao, et al.. (2021). Improving the Evaluation of Faculty Development Programs. Academic Medicine. 96(10). 1496–1496. 3 indexed citations
7.
Tews, Matthew, et al.. (2021). Student Performance During a Simulated Patient Encounter Has No Impact on Debriefer Adherence to PEARLS Debriefing Model. Medical Science Educator. 31(3). 1141–1148. 2 indexed citations
8.
Chen, Weichao & A.J. Kleinheksel. (2021). Six ways to get a grip on leveraging the expertise of Instructional Design and Technology professionals. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(3). 142–146. 2 indexed citations
9.
Kleinheksel, A.J., Nicole Rockich‐Winston, Huda E. Tawfik, & Tasha R. Wyatt. (2020). Demystifying Content Analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 84(1). 7113–7113. 493 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Wyatt, Tasha R., A.J. Kleinheksel, & Matthew Tews. (2020). Linking Patient Care Ownership and Professional Identity Formation through Simulation. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 33(2). 164–172. 9 indexed citations
11.
Kleinheksel, A.J., et al.. (2019). Demographic and spatial trends in diabetes-related virtual nursing examinations. Social Science & Medicine. 222. 225–230. 5 indexed citations
12.
Strekalova, Yulia A., et al.. (2019). Gender differences in the expression and cognition of empathy among nursing students: An educational assessment study. Nurse Education Today. 81. 1–6. 19 indexed citations
13.
Wyatt, Tasha R., et al.. (2019). Simulation as a Tool to Promote Professional Identity Formation and Patient Ownership in Medical Students. Simulation & Gaming. 50(6). 711–724. 10 indexed citations
14.
Kleinheksel, A.J. & Albert D. Ritzhaupt. (2017). Measuring the adoption and integration of virtual patient simulations in nursing education: An exploratory factor analysis. Computers & Education. 108. 11–29. 14 indexed citations
15.
Foronda, Cynthia, Celeste M. Alfes, Parvati Dev, et al.. (2016). Virtually Nursing. Nurse Educator. 42(1). 14–17. 97 indexed citations
16.
Strekalova, Yulia A., Janice L. Krieger, A.J. Kleinheksel, & Aaron Kotranza. (2016). Empathic Communication in Virtual Education for Nursing Students. Nurse Educator. 42(1). 18–22. 24 indexed citations
17.
Strekalova, Yulia A., Janice L. Krieger, Jordan M. Neil, et al.. (2016). I Understand How You Feel. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 36(1). 61–79. 14 indexed citations
18.
Kleinheksel, A.J.. (2014). Transformative Learning through Virtual Patient Simulations: Predicting Critical Student Reflections. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 10(6). e301–e308. 37 indexed citations
19.
Antonenko, Pavlo, et al.. (2014). Trends in the crowdfunding of educational technology startups. TechTrends. 58(6). 36–41. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026