Agnès Blaye

3.9k citations
70 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Agnès Blaye

68 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Agnès Blaye
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 782
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 429
  • General Decision Sciences 52
  • Statistics and Probability 189
Replace Pedro Macizo with:
Pedro Macizo Spain
Lynda K. Hall United States
Ben Ambridge United Kingdom
Paola Palladino Italy
Susan D. Lima United States
Debra L. Long United States
Markus Conrad Germany
Fen Xu China
Janice Johnson Canada
Napoleon Katsos United Kingdom
Agnès Blaye relative to Pedro Macizo Spain Pedro Macizo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Pedro Macizo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Agnès Blaye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Agnès Blaye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agnès Blaye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agnès Blaye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Agnès Blaye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agnès Blaye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agnès Blaye. The network helps show where Agnès Blaye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Agnès Blaye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Agnès Blaye Line = papers co-authored together Agnès Blaye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010190
2 2010128
3 2009111
4 200891
5 201284
6 199181
7 201865
8 200163
9 201053
10 200648
11 201647
12 198945
13 198942
14 201038
15 201635
16 200931
17 201729
18 201629
19 200426
20 201226

About Agnès Blaye

Agnès Blaye is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (37 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (25 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (13 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (11 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (6 papers) and Categorization, perception, and language (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (782 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (429 citations), General Decision Sciences (52 citations) and Statistics and Probability (189 citations). Agnès Blaye has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Nicolas Chevalier, Ellen Bialystok, Diane Poulin‐Dubois, Françoise Bonthoux, Paul Light, Raluca Barac, Corentin Gonthier, Vittorio Girotto, Jutta Kray and Michel Gilly. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Developmental Psychology, Developmental Science, Cognitive Development and British Journal of Developmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact