Ben Ambridge

5.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
65 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Ben Ambridge is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ben Ambridge has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 40 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 16 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Ben Ambridge's work include Language Development and Disorders (50 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (38 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (38 papers). Ben Ambridge is often cited by papers focused on Language Development and Disorders (50 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (38 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (38 papers). Ben Ambridge collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Netherlands. Ben Ambridge's co-authors include Susan J. Pickering, Susan E. Gathercole, Caroline F. Rowland, Elena Lieven, Julián M. Pine, Anna Theakston, Franklin Chang, Evan Kidd, Adele Ε. Goldberg and Amy Bidgood and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Review and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Ben Ambridge

61 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

The Structure of Working Memory From 4 to 15 Years of Age. 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ben Ambridge United Kingdom 24 2.1k 1.5k 769 698 473 65 3.2k
Evan Kidd Australia 29 2.3k 1.1× 1.6k 1.1× 573 0.7× 515 0.7× 272 0.6× 121 3.1k
Jon Andoni Duñabeitia Spain 43 3.2k 1.6× 3.7k 2.5× 492 0.6× 1.3k 1.8× 446 0.9× 183 5.1k
Jesse Snedeker United States 32 2.1k 1.0× 1.8k 1.2× 865 1.1× 946 1.4× 515 1.1× 109 3.2k
Janet F. McLean United Kingdom 19 1.2k 0.6× 1.0k 0.7× 482 0.6× 521 0.7× 435 0.9× 43 2.0k
Yosef Grodzinsky Israel 29 3.3k 1.6× 4.0k 2.7× 1.1k 1.4× 732 1.0× 359 0.8× 69 4.8k
Naama Friedmann Israel 36 3.0k 1.4× 2.8k 1.9× 688 0.9× 518 0.7× 271 0.6× 135 4.1k
Twila Tardif United States 30 2.6k 1.3× 1.0k 0.7× 298 0.4× 479 0.7× 122 0.3× 77 3.5k
Helen Smith Cairns United States 21 1.7k 0.8× 1.5k 1.0× 572 0.7× 778 1.1× 359 0.8× 51 2.6k
Walter J. B. van Heuven United Kingdom 28 3.4k 1.7× 3.5k 2.4× 785 1.0× 1.2k 1.7× 713 1.5× 50 4.8k
Falk Huettig Netherlands 33 2.1k 1.0× 2.8k 1.9× 340 0.4× 2.0k 2.8× 521 1.1× 128 4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Ambridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Ambridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Ambridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Ambridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Ambridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Ambridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Ambridge. The network helps show where Ben Ambridge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Ambridge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Ambridge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Ambridge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Ambridge. Ben Ambridge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Ambridge, Ben, et al.. (2024). Large language models are better than theoretical linguists at theoretical linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics. 50(1-2). 33–48. 4 indexed citations
5.
Saviciute, Egle, Ben Ambridge, & Julián M. Pine. (2017). The roles of word-form frequency and phonological neighbourhood density in the acquisition of Lithuanian noun morphology. Journal of Child Language. 45(3). 641–672. 20 indexed citations
6.
Twomey, Katherine E., Franklin Chang, & Ben Ambridge. (2016). Lexical distributional cues, but not situational cues, are readily used to learn abstract locative verb-structure associations. Cognition. 153. 124–139. 8 indexed citations
7.
Ambridge, Ben, Julián M. Pine, & Elena Lieven. (2015). Explanatory adequacy is not enough: Response to commentators on ‘Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn't help’. Language. 91(3). e116–e126. 3 indexed citations
8.
Ambridge, Ben, Evan Kidd, Caroline F. Rowland, & Anna Theakston. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language. 42(2). 239–273. 246 indexed citations
9.
Ambridge, Ben, et al.. (2015). Is Grammar Spared in Autism Spectrum Disorder? Data from Judgments of Verb Argument Structure Overgeneralization Errors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 45(10). 3288–3296. 14 indexed citations
10.
Ambridge, Ben, Julián M. Pine, & Elena Lieven. (2014). Child Language Acquisition: Why Universal Grammar Doesn't Help. Language. 90(3). e53–e90. 46 indexed citations
11.
Twomey, Katherine E., Franklin Chang, & Ben Ambridge. (2014). Do as I say, not as I do: A lexical distributional account of English locative verb class acquisition. Cognitive Psychology. 73. 41–71. 23 indexed citations
12.
Twomey, Katherine E., Franklin Chang, & Ben Ambridge. (2013). A distributional learning account of the acquisition of the locative alternation:corpus analysis and modeling. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 4 indexed citations
13.
Ambridge, Ben, et al.. (2013). Infinitives or bare stems? Are English-speaking children defaulting to the highest-frequency form?. Journal of Child Language. 41(4). 756–779. 31 indexed citations
14.
Ambridge, Ben & Caroline F. Rowland. (2013). Experimental methods in studying child language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science. 4(2). 149–168. 41 indexed citations
15.
Ambridge, Ben, Julián M. Pine, & Caroline F. Rowland. (2012). Semantics versus statistics in the retreat from locative overgeneralization errors. Cognition. 123(2). 260–279. 55 indexed citations
16.
Rowland, Caroline F., Franklin Chang, Ben Ambridge, Julián M. Pine, & Elena Lieven. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition. 125(1). 49–63. 144 indexed citations
17.
Ambridge, Ben. (2010). Children's judgments of regular and irregular novel past-tense forms: New data on the English past-tense debate.. Developmental Psychology. 46(6). 1497–1504. 26 indexed citations
18.
Ambridge, Ben, Caroline F. Rowland, & Julián M. Pine. (2008). Is Structure Dependence an Innate Constraint? New Experimental Evidence From Children's Complex‐Question Production. Cognitive Science. 32(1). 222–255. 26 indexed citations
19.
Ambridge, Ben & Julián M. Pine. (2006). Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model using an elicited imitation paradigm. Journal of Child Language. 33(4). 879–898. 14 indexed citations
20.
Gathercole, Susan E., et al.. (2004). The Structure of Working Memory From 4 to 15 Years of Age.. Developmental Psychology. 40(2). 177–190. 1214 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026