The Teacher Educator

822 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 822 papers published in The Teacher Educator in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in The Teacher Educator usually cover Education (645 papers), Sociology and Political Science (123 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (108 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (381 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (177 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Teacher Educator are Tyrone C. Howard, Geneva Gay, W. James Popham, Deborah L. Schussler, Tom Ganser, Robert L. Williams, Ruth A. Wiebe Berry, Janet Dyment, Jillian Downing and Barohny Eun.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Teacher Educator

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Teacher Educator. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Teacher Educator.

Countries where authors publish in The Teacher Educator

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Teacher Educator. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Teacher Educator with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Teacher Educator more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025