Action in Teacher Education

1.4k papers and 10.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Action in Teacher Education in the last decades have received a total of 10.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Action in Teacher Education usually cover Education (1.1k papers), Sociology and Political Science (286 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (142 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (721 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (321 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (225 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Action in Teacher Education are Patricia J. Larke, Frank Pajares, Maria L. Fernández, Martin Haberman, Carl A. Grant, Marilyn Cochran‐Smith, Leisa A. Martin, Linda Darling‐Hammond, C. J. Daane and S. Michael Putman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Action in Teacher Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Action in Teacher Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Action in Teacher Education.

Countries where authors publish in Action in Teacher Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Action in Teacher Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Action in Teacher Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Action in Teacher Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025