Teaching English With Technology

329 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 329 papers published in Teaching English With Technology in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Teaching English With Technology usually cover Education (130 papers), Language and Linguistics (106 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (99 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (94 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (47 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Teaching English With Technology are Gilbert Dizon, Nagaletchimee Annamalai, Saovapa Wichadee, Euan Bonner, Ruba Fahmi Bataineh, Hayo Reinders, Reza Dashtestani, Yunisrina Qismullah Yusuf, Ali Karakaş and Herri Mulyono.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Teaching English With Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Teaching English With Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Teaching English With Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Teaching English With Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Teaching English With Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Teaching English With Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teaching English With Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025