Review of Education

370 papers and 3.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 370 papers published in Review of Education in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Education usually cover Education (231 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (80 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (62 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (50 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (44 papers) and Educational Assessment and Improvement (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Education are Ben Levin, Johan Muller, Michael Young, Peter Goodyear, Robert A. Ellis, Benjamin Kutsyuruba, Don A. Klinger, Khalid Arar, Jennifer Symonds and Maurice Galton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Education.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025