Digital Education Review

391 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 391 papers published in Digital Education Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Digital Education Review usually cover Information Systems (190 papers), Education (183 papers) and Computer Science Applications (135 papers) specifically the topics of E-Learning and Knowledge Management (108 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (107 papers) and Digital literacy in education (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Digital Education Review are Bernard Robin, Jorge Figueroa, Susanne Narciss, James Paul Gee, Pablo Rivera-Vargas, Demetrios G. Sampson, Charalampos Karagiannidis, J. Michael Spector, David Buckingham and Marta Pinto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Digital Education Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Digital Education Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Digital Education Review.

Countries where authors publish in Digital Education Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Digital Education Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Digital Education Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital Education Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025