Support for Learning

8.4k citations
915 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Educational and Psychological Assessments 173
    • Reading and Literacy Development 85
    • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion 209
    • Education Systems and Policy 135
    • Parental Involvement in Education 103
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 96
    • Early Childhood Education and Development 88

Support for Learning

760 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Support for Learning
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Safety Research 1.7k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.3k
  • Education 5.1k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.4k
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 163
Replace International Journal of Special Education (IJSE) with:
International Journal of Special Education (IJSE) United States
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs United Kingdom
British Journal of Special Education United Kingdom
Journal of Research in Childhood Education United States
Rural Special Education Quarterly United States
Journal of Disability Policy Studies United States
Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth United States
Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties United Kingdom
Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation United States
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood Australia
Support for Learning relative to International Journal of Special Education (IJSE) United States International Journal of Special Education (IJSE)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
International Journal of Special Education (IJSE) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Support for Learning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Support for Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Support for Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Support for Learning more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Support for Learning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Support for Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Support for Learning.

About Support for Learning

The 915 papers published in Support for Learning in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Support for Learning usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (301 papers), Education (599 papers), Safety Research (110 papers), Clinical Psychology (247 papers) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (10 papers) specifically the topics of Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (209 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (205 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (173 papers), Education Systems and Policy (135 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (103 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (96 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (88 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Support for Learning are Jonathan Glazzard, Marilyn Espe-Sherwindt, Neil Humphrey, Alan Dyson, Mel Ainscow, Christopher Boyle, Garry Hornby, Ian Rivers, David Ryan and Ann Lewis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact