Journal of Disability Policy Studies

706 papers and 9.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 706 papers published in Journal of Disability Policy Studies in the last decades have received a total of 9.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Disability Policy Studies usually cover Safety Research (291 papers), Education (218 papers) and General Health Professions (180 papers) specifically the topics of Disability Education and Employment (245 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (150 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Disability Policy Studies are Sophie Mitra, Erik W. Carter, June Isaacson Kailes, Audrey A. Trainor, Diane Austin, Michael Palmer, Harlan Hahn, Paul T. Jaeger, David Mank and Susan Peters.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Disability Policy Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Disability Policy Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Disability Policy Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Disability Policy Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Disability Policy Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Disability Policy Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025