Peter Nikken

2.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
28 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Peter Nikken is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Nikken has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Education, 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 12 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Peter Nikken's work include Child Development and Digital Technology (22 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (18 papers) and Social Media and Politics (12 papers). Peter Nikken is often cited by papers focused on Child Development and Digital Technology (22 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (18 papers) and Social Media and Politics (12 papers). Peter Nikken collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Bulgaria and United States. Peter Nikken's co-authors include Jeroen Jansz, Marjon Schols, Hanneke de Graaf, Jochen Peter, Dian A. de Vries, Jos de Haan, Suzanna J. Opree, Nathalie Sonck, Tom H. A. van der Voort and Natascha Notten and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Sex Roles and New Media & Society.

In The Last Decade

Peter Nikken

26 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

How and Why Parents Guide the Media Use of Young Children 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 2015 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Nikken Netherlands 16 1.4k 1.4k 548 360 192 28 1.9k
Eric E. Rasmussen United States 17 975 0.7× 863 0.6× 211 0.4× 206 0.6× 337 1.8× 35 1.4k
Eline Frison Belgium 13 590 0.4× 1.5k 1.1× 470 0.9× 469 1.3× 54 0.3× 20 1.8k
Ágnes Zsila Hungary 16 514 0.4× 1.2k 0.9× 207 0.4× 534 1.5× 214 1.1× 57 1.6k
Kelly L. Schmitt United States 14 739 0.5× 564 0.4× 165 0.3× 103 0.3× 183 1.0× 31 1.2k
Ruth Festl Germany 20 656 0.5× 1.1k 0.8× 252 0.5× 257 0.7× 127 0.7× 40 1.6k
Laura Widyanto United Kingdom 5 717 0.5× 1.4k 1.0× 304 0.6× 356 1.0× 55 0.3× 5 1.5k
Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther United Kingdom 7 761 0.5× 1.8k 1.3× 284 0.5× 544 1.5× 34 0.2× 9 2.0k
Minas Michikyan United States 12 406 0.3× 678 0.5× 172 0.3× 226 0.6× 44 0.2× 24 1.0k
David Seungjae Lee United States 5 405 0.3× 1.5k 1.1× 456 0.8× 329 0.9× 45 0.2× 5 1.8k
Lukáš Blinka Czechia 15 535 0.4× 870 0.6× 228 0.4× 222 0.6× 65 0.3× 44 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Nikken

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Nikken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Nikken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Nikken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Nikken

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Nikken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Nikken. The network helps show where Peter Nikken may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Nikken

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Nikken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Nikken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Nikken. Peter Nikken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nikken, Peter. (2021). The touch-screen generation: Trends in Dutch parents’ perceptions of young children’s media use from 2012–2018. Communications. 47(2). 286–306. 5 indexed citations
2.
Nikken, Peter & Suzanna J. Opree. (2018). Guiding Young Children’s Digital Media Use: SES-Differences in Mediation Concerns and Competence. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 27(6). 1844–1857. 78 indexed citations
3.
Nikken, Peter. (2016). Vragen en ondersteuningsbehoefte bij de mediaopvoeding door ouders van jonge kinderen. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschappen. 44(1).
4.
Vries, Dian A. de, Jochen Peter, Hanneke de Graaf, & Peter Nikken. (2015). Adolescents’ Social Network Site Use, Peer Appearance-Related Feedback, and Body Dissatisfaction: Testing a Mediation Model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 45(1). 211–224. 230 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Nikken, Peter & Marjon Schols. (2015). How and Why Parents Guide the Media Use of Young Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 24(11). 3423–3435. 355 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Nikken, Peter & Jos de Haan. (2015). Guiding young children’s internet use at home: Problems that parents experience in their parental mediation and the need for parenting support. Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 9(1). 57 indexed citations
7.
Notten, Natascha & Peter Nikken. (2014). Boys and girls taking risks online: A gendered perspective on social context and adolescents’ risky online behavior. New Media & Society. 18(6). 966–988. 62 indexed citations
8.
Vries, Dian A. de, Jochen Peter, Peter Nikken, & Hanneke de Graaf. (2014). The Effect of Social Network Site Use on Appearance Investment and Desire for Cosmetic Surgery Among Adolescent Boys and Girls. Sex Roles. 71(9-10). 283–295. 100 indexed citations
9.
Nikken, Peter & Jeroen Jansz. (2013). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning Media and Technology. 39(2). 250–266. 243 indexed citations
10.
Nikken, Peter & Hanneke de Graaf. (2012). Reciprocal Relationships Between Friends’ and Parental Mediation of Adolescents’ Media Use and Their Sexual Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 42(11). 1696–1707. 48 indexed citations
11.
Sonck, Nathalie, Peter Nikken, & Jos de Haan. (2012). Determinants of Internet Mediation:. Journal of Children and Media. 7(1). 96–113. 107 indexed citations
12.
Nikken, Peter. (2011). On media, children, and their parents. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
13.
Nikken, Peter, et al.. (2007). Parents' Interest in Videogame Ratings and Content Descriptors in Relation to Game Mediation. European Journal of Communication. 22(3). 315–336. 54 indexed citations
14.
Nikken, Peter & Jeroen Jansz. (2007). PLAYING RESTRICTED VIDEOGAMES. Journal of Children and Media. 1(3). 227–243. 20 indexed citations
15.
Nikken, Peter & Jeroen Jansz. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: a comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning Media and Technology. 31(2). 181–202. 258 indexed citations
16.
Valkenburg, Patti M., et al.. (2002). Kijkwijzer: The Dutch Rating System for Audiovisual Productions. Communications. 27(1). 15 indexed citations
17.
Nikken, Peter & Tom H. A. van der Voort. (1997). Children's Views on Quality Standards for Children's Television Programs. 23(2-3). 169–188. 6 indexed citations
18.
Nikken, Peter, et al.. (1996). Maternal Quality Standards for Children's Television Programs. 22(1). 41–54. 8 indexed citations
19.
Voort, Tom H. A. van der, et al.. (1992). Replication: Determinants of parental guidance of children's television viewing: A Dutch replication study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 36(1). 61–74. 79 indexed citations
20.
Nikken, Peter & Allerd Peeters. (1988). Children's perceptions of television reality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 32(4). 441–452. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026