Journal of Computing in Higher EducationUnited States
Research in Learning TechnologyUnited Kingdom
Innovations in Education and Teaching InternationalUnited Kingdom
The Asia-Pacific Education ResearcherChina
Computers in the SchoolsUnited States
E-Learning and Digital MediaUnited States
Learning Media and TechnologyUnited Kingdom
Online LearningUnited States
Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-LearningUnited Kingdom
Technology Pedagogy and EducationUnited KingdomView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Educational Media International
Educational Media International · 1×
×1.29.8kEDUCA
×0.83.2kDEP
×1.54.6kIS
×0.92.1kSPS
×0.92.0kCSA
Citations per year, relative to Educational Media International
Educational Media International · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Educational Media International
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Media International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Media International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Media International more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Educational Media International
This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Media International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Media International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.