Educational Media International

860 papers and 10.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 860 papers published in Educational Media International in the last decades have received a total of 10.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Media International usually cover Education (472 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (250 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (143 papers) specifically the topics of Online and Blended Learning (250 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (192 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Media International are Matt Bower, Charalambos Vrasidas, Chih‐Hsiung Tu, John Hedberg, Japhet E. Lawrence, Usman A. Tar, Lynna J. Ausburn, David Hung, Theodore J. Kopcha and Keri Duncan Valentine.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Media International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Media International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Media International.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Media International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Media International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Media International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Media International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025