Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation4.5k
Developmental and Educational Psychology4.2k
Replace International Review for the Sociology of Sport with:
International Review for the Sociology of SportUnited Kingdom
Sport in SocietyUnited Kingdom
Journal of Sport and Social IssuesUnited States
Sport Management ReviewUnited States
Journal of Sport ManagementUnited States
Sport Education and SocietyUnited Kingdom
QuestUnited States
Leisure StudiesUnited Kingdom
Journal of Leisure ResearchUnited States
Leisure SciencesUnited States
International Review for the Sociology of SportUnited KingdomView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Sociology of Sport Journal
Sociology of Sport Journal · 1×
×1.122.0kSPS
×1.018.6kGS
×0.96.4kSP
×0.83.7kPTSTR
×0.73.1kDEP
Citations per year, relative to Sociology of Sport Journal
Sociology of Sport Journal · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Sociology of Sport Journal
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sociology of Sport Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sociology of Sport Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sociology of Sport Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Sociology of Sport Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sociology of Sport Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sociology of Sport Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.