Pharmacogenetics and Genomics

1.4k papers and 50.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics in the last decades have received a total of 50.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics usually cover Molecular Biology (448 papers), Pharmacology (362 papers) and Oncology (335 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (352 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (230 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (119 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics are Russ B. Altman, Teri E. Klein, Caroline F. Thorn, Howard L. McLeod, Katrin Sangkuhl, Sharon Marsh, Mikko Niemi, Pertti J. Neuvonen, Daqing Wang and Connie Oshiro.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmacogenetics and Genomics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacogenetics and Genomics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025