Educational Action Research

1.2k papers and 18.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Educational Action Research in the last decades have received a total of 18.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Action Research usually cover Education (840 papers), Sociology and Political Science (363 papers) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (297 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (444 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (297 papers) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (185 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Action Research are Nicole Mockler, Stephen Kemmis, Tina Cook, Pamela Munn, Clem Adelman, Allan Feldman, Bridget Somekh, Kenneth M. Zeichner, John Elliott and Susan Walsh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Action Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Action Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Action Research.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Action Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Action Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Action Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Action Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025