Dyslexia

621 papers and 14.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 621 papers published in Dyslexia in the last decades have received a total of 14.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Dyslexia usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (557 papers), Statistics and Probability (254 papers) and Education (210 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (527 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (254 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dyslexia are John Stein, Margaret J. Snowling, Usha Goswami, John Everatt, Roderick I. Nicolson, Uta Frith, Angela J. Fawcett, Franck Ramus, Chris Singleton and Sylviane Valdois.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Dyslexia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Dyslexia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dyslexia.

Countries where authors publish in Dyslexia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dyslexia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dyslexia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dyslexia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025