Written Communication

737 papers and 20.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 737 papers published in Written Communication in the last decades have received a total of 20.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Written Communication usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (418 papers), Education (317 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (190 papers) specifically the topics of Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (364 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (190 papers) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Written Communication are John R. Hayes, Ken Hyland, Peter Smagorinsky, David R. Russell, Jeanne Fahnestock, Theresa Lillis, Glynda Hull, Anne Haas Dyson, N. Ann Chenoweth and Charles Bazerman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Written Communication

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Written Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Written Communication.

Countries where authors publish in Written Communication

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Written Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Written Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Written Communication more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025