Wm. David Salisbury

782 total citations
12 papers, 538 citations indexed

About

Wm. David Salisbury is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Wm. David Salisbury has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 538 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Wm. David Salisbury's work include Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (4 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers). Wm. David Salisbury is often cited by papers focused on Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (4 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers). Wm. David Salisbury collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Wm. David Salisbury's co-authors include James M. Bloodgood, Wynne W. Chin, Allison W. Pearson, Michael Parent, R. Brent Gallupe, Jay M. Handelman, Michael F. Gorman, John J. Kanet, Traci Carte and Thomas W. Ferratt and has published in prestigious journals such as Information & Management, Information Systems Research and Decision Support Systems.

In The Last Decade

Wm. David Salisbury

12 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Wm. David Salisbury
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Communication 208
  • Strategy and Management 166
  • Social Psychology 113
  • Sociology and Political Science 90
  • Information Systems and Management 68
Replace Norberto Hoppen with:
Norberto Hoppen Brazil
Katharina Weinkauf Germany
Anna Wiewiora Australia
Ben Martz United States
Anastasia Sergeeva Netherlands
Jacob Chia-An Tsai Taiwan
Jessica Lipnack United States
Robert A. Zawacki United States
Wendy Olphert United Kingdom
Norberto Hoppen Brazil View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Wm. David Salisbury
Wm. David Salisbury · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Wm. David Salisbury
Wm. David Salisbury · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Wm. David Salisbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wm. David Salisbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wm. David Salisbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wm. David Salisbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wm. David Salisbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wm. David Salisbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wm. David Salisbury. The network helps show where Wm. David Salisbury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wm. David Salisbury

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wm. David Salisbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wm. David Salisbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wm. David Salisbury. Wm. David Salisbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 5
2 10
3 6
4 38
5 31
6 3
7 3
8 211
9 2
10 104
11 122
12
To Agree or Not to Agree: Do GSS Help or Hinder Group Consensus?
3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026