Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology
2004669 citationsRobert V. Kozinets, Jay M. HandelmanJournal of Consumer Researchprofile →
The Role of Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment
1999623 citationsJay M. Handelman, Stephen J. ArnoldJournal of Marketingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jay M. Handelman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay M. Handelman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay M. Handelman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay M. Handelman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay M. Handelman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay M. Handelman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay M. Handelman. The network helps show where Jay M. Handelman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay M. Handelman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay M. Handelman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay M. Handelman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jay M. Handelman. Jay M. Handelman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cunningham, Peggy, et al.. (2016). Respect in Buyer/Seller Relationships. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration. 35(2). 198–213.10 indexed citations
7.
Handelman, Jay M., et al.. (2014). The Role of Ideology in Contesting Market-Based Institutional Arrangements. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Handelman, Jay M., et al.. (2004). Community Oriented Corporate Social Responsibility: Consumer Evaluation of Community Attachment. ACR North American Advances.8 indexed citations
14.
Kozinets, Robert V. & Jay M. Handelman. (2004). Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology. Journal of Consumer Research. 31(3). 691–704.669 indexed citations breakdown →
Handelman, Jay M.. (1999). Culture Jamming: Expanding the Application of the Critical Research Project. ACR North American Advances.26 indexed citations
17.
Handelman, Jay M. & Stephen J. Arnold. (1999). The Role of Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment. Journal of Marketing. 63(3). 33–48.623 indexed citations breakdown →
Kozinets, Robert V. & Jay M. Handelman. (1998). Ensouling Consumption: a Netnographic Exploration of the Meaning of Boycotting Behavior. ACR North American Advances.152 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.