William Nelles
Impact in
- Architecture top 0.5%
- Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Media Technology top 5%
- Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Experimental Learning in Engineering
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Engineering Education and Pedagogy 2
-
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 8
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 3
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship 3
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 3
- Short Stories in Global Literature 1
- Semiotics and Representation Studies 1
- Co-authors
- James A. Golen (2 shared papers)J. Dowd (1 shared paper)Linda Ruth Williams (1 shared paper)Harold F. Mosher (1 shared paper)Wallace Martin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Style (4 papers)Poetics Today (3 papers)Narrative (2 papers)English Literary Renaissance (1 paper)Neophilologus (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Nelles
14 papers receiving 192 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Architecture 75
- Media Technology 99
- Literature and Literary Theory 98
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 35
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
Countries citing papers authored by William Nelles
This map shows the geographic impact of William Nelles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Nelles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Nelles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Nelles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Nelles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Nelles. The network helps show where William Nelles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside William Nelles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 41 | |
| 3 | Frameworks: Narrative Levels and Embedded Narrative | 1997 | 35 |
| 4 | 1990 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 16 | Werner Wolf and Walter Bernhart, Eds. Framing Borders in Literature and Other Media | 2006 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 0 |
About William Nelles
William Nelles is a scholar working on Architecture, Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Cultural Studies and Media Technology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Narrative Theory and Analysis (8 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (3 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (2 papers), Short Stories in Global Literature (1 paper) and Semiotics and Representation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (75 citations), Media Technology (99 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (98 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (35 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations). William Nelles has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James A. Golen, J. Dowd, Linda Ruth Williams, Harold F. Mosher and Wallace Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Style, Poetics Today, Narrative, English Literary Renaissance and Neophilologus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.