William Kist

23 papers receiving 144 citations

Peers

William Kist
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Speech and Hearing 53
  • Literature and Literary Theory 93
  • Communication 28
  • Education 106
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 23
Replace Joanne Collie with:
Joanne Collie United States
Rebecca Lorimer Leonard United States
Stephen Slater United States
Sandra Abegglen United Kingdom
Kara Taczak United States
Fatimah Sari Indonesia
Deborah Mason United Kingdom
Liane Robertson United States
Carol Ann Pesola
Helena Curtain
William Kist relative to Joanne Collie United States Joanne Collie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joanne Collie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Kist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Kist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Kist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Kist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Kist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Kist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Kist. The network helps show where William Kist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside William Kist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Kist Line = papers co-authored together William Kist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200833
2 200030
3 201022
4 200018
5 201517
6 200711
7 201410
8 20039
9
Finding "New Literacy" in Action: An Interdisciplinary High School Western Civilization Class.
20028
10 20178
11
Class, Get Ready to Tweet: Social Media in the Classroom.
20138
12 20107
13
New Literacies and the Common Core.
20136
14
EFFECTS OF AEROBIC TRAINING AND GENDER ON HDL-C AND LDL-C SUBFRACTIONS IN YUCATAN MINIATURE SWINE
19996
15 20175
16 20054
17 20103
18 20183
19 20172
20 20072

About William Kist

William Kist is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing and Communication, having authored 28 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literacy, Media, and Education (14 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Education Systems and Policy (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers) and Education and Digital Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (53 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (93 citations), Communication (28 citations), Education (106 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (23 citations). William Kist has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Kristine E. Pytash, Tom Thomas, Richard H. Cox, M. Harold Laughlin, C. Gopalan, Raúl Alberto Mora, Nancy Padak, Joshua D. Mitchell, Sharon D. Kruse and Richard E. Ferdig. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Educational Media International, International journal of exercise science, Phi Delta Kappan and Journal of Applied Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact