Joanne Collie
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Information Systems
- Co-authors
- Stephen SlaterIlona LekiStuart RedmanParham RasoulinejadKevin R. GurrChristopher S. BaileyFawaz SiddiqiJennifer Urquhart
- Topics
- Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper)Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Language and LinguisticsLiterature and Literary TheoryDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Joanne Collie
7 papers receiving 149 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Language and Linguistics 117
- Literature and Literary Theory 88
- Education 85
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 56
- Information Systems 36
Countries citing papers authored by Joanne Collie
This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne Collie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne Collie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne Collie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne Collie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne Collie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne Collie. The network helps show where Joanne Collie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanne Collie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanne Collie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanne Collie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanne Collie. Joanne Collie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | What's It Like?: Life and Culture in Britain Today | 1 |
| 3 | True to life : English for adult learners : intermediate | 2 |
| 4 | Paths Into Poetry | 5 |
| 5 | Short Stories: For Creative Language Classrooms | 3 |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 171 |
About Joanne Collie
Joanne Collie is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Literature and Literary Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper), Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (117 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (88 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (56 citations). Joanne Collie has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Slater, Ilona Leki, Stuart Redman, Parham Rasoulinejad, Kevin R. Gurr, Christopher S. Bailey, Fawaz Siddiqi, Jennifer Urquhart and Donna M. Brinton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Modern Language Journal and TESOL Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.