William Gardner
Impact in
-
- Child and Animal Learning Development
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Reading and Literacy Development
- Human Factors and Ergonomics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Educational and Psychological Assessments 2
- Child and Animal Learning Development 2
- Reading and Literacy Development 1
-
- Early Childhood Education and Development 3
- Co-authors
- Barbara Rogoff (5 shared papers)Shari Ellis (2 shared papers)Brian L. Wilcox (1 shared paper)Loren H. Roth (1 shared paper)Marlene Eisenberg (1 shared paper)Nancy Bennett (1 shared paper)John Monahan (1 shared paper)Charles W. Lidz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Developmental Psychology (4 papers)Law and Human Behavior (1 paper)Psychological Bulletin (1 paper)American Psychologist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Gardner
8 papers receiving 323 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 196
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 24
- Education 186
- Clinical Psychology 89
- Statistics and Probability 30
Countries citing papers authored by William Gardner
This map shows the geographic impact of William Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Gardner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Gardner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Gardner. The network helps show where William Gardner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside William Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adult guidance of cognitive development. | 1984 | 153 |
| 2 | 1984 | 96 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 58 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 1 |
About William Gardner
William Gardner is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Information Systems, having authored 8 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (196 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (24 citations), Education (186 citations), Clinical Psychology (89 citations) and Statistics and Probability (30 citations). William Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Rogoff, Shari Ellis, Brian L. Wilcox, Loren H. Roth, Marlene Eisenberg, Nancy Bennett, John Monahan, Charles W. Lidz, Edward P. Mulvey and Steven K. Hoge. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Law and Human Behavior, Psychological Bulletin and American Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.