Countries where authors publish in Law and Human Behavior
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Law and Human Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Law and Human Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Law and Human Behavior more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Law and Human Behavior
This network shows the impact of papers published in Law and Human Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Law and Human Behavior.
About Law and Human Behavior
The 1.8k papers published in Law and Human Behavior in the last decades have received a total of 69.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Law and Human Behavior usually cover Law (418 papers), Clinical Psychology (674 papers) and Social Psychology (626 papers) specifically the topics of Deception detection and forensic psychology (523 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (471 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (349 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (323 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (259 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (251 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (161 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Law and Human Behavior are Marnie E. Rice, Grant T. Harris, Saul M. Kassin, Thomas Grisso, Brian H. Bornstein, Gary L. Wells, Steven Penrod, Paul S. Appelbaum, Glenn D. Walters and John Monahan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.