Law and Human Behavior

1.8k papers and 64.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Law and Human Behavior in the last decades have received a total of 64.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Law and Human Behavior usually cover Clinical Psychology (674 papers), Sociology and Political Science (652 papers) and Social Psychology (619 papers) specifically the topics of Deception detection and forensic psychology (517 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (472 papers) and Jury Decision Making Processes (351 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Law and Human Behavior are Marnie E. Rice, Grant T. Harris, Thomas Grisso, Saul M. Kassin, Brian H. Bornstein, Gary L. Wells, Steven Penrod, Paul S. Appelbaum, John Monahan and Glenn D. Walters.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Law and Human Behavior

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Law and Human Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Law and Human Behavior.

Countries where authors publish in Law and Human Behavior

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Law and Human Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Law and Human Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Law and Human Behavior more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025