William Baird
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 8
-
- Graph theory and applications 2
-
- Religion, Society, and Development 2
-
- Advanced Graph Theory Research 2
- Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems 2
-
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies 2
-
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 2
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies 2
William Baird
13 papers receiving 639 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 344
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 330
- Education 309
- Social Psychology 153
- Religious studies 34
Countries citing papers authored by William Baird
This map shows the geographic impact of William Baird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Baird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Baird more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Baird
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Baird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Baird. The network helps show where William Baird may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside William Baird, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catalogue of the Species of Entozoa, or Intestinal Worms | 2019 | 0 |
| 2 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 4 | A cyclopaedia of the natural sciences | 2011 | 2 |
| 5 | From Jonathan Edwards to Rudolf Bultmann | 2003 | 0 |
| 6 | History of New Testament research / Vol. 1, From deism to Tübingen | 1992 | 1 |
| 7 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 244 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 275 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 195 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 6 | |
| 13 | Acts & Paul's letters : a commentary on Acts, Romans, I & II Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, I & II Thessalonians, I & II Timothy, Titus, Philemon | 1983 | 1 |
| 14 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1978 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1974 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1965 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1959 | 3 |
About William Baird
William Baird is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Geometry and Topology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (8 papers), Graph theory and applications (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (2 papers), Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (344 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (330 citations), Education (309 citations), Social Psychology (153 citations) and Religious studies (34 citations). William Baird has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Suzanne Hidi, Anthony Bonato, Gordon D. Fee, Yvon Ouellet, James Davis, Charles M. Laymon, John F. McCauley and Andrew Beveridge. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Cognitive Science, New Testament Studies, Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.