Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Surface ionization and complexation at the oxide/water interface
This map shows the geographic impact of James Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Davis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Davis. The network helps show where James Davis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Davis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Davis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Davis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Davis. James Davis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Davis, James, Richard L. Smith, J. K. Böhlke, et al.. (2015). Oxidation of naturally reduced uranium in aquifer sediments by dissolved oxygen and its potential significance to uranium plume persistence. 2015 AGU Fall Meeting. 2015.1 indexed citations
7.
Yuan, Xiu, et al.. (2015). Hydrogen Peroxide in Groundwater at Rifle, Colorado. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2015.1 indexed citations
Ketelson, Howard A., et al.. (2009). Extensional Rheological Properties of Artificial Tear Solutions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 4642–4642.1 indexed citations
10.
Campbell, Kate M., Nikolla Qafoku, Ravi Kukkadapu, et al.. (2008). Characterizing the extent and role of natural subsurface bioreduction in a uranium-contaminated aquifer. GeCAS. 72(12).10 indexed citations
11.
Hyun, Seunghun, Kate M. Campbell, Kim F. Hayes, & James Davis. (2007). Experimental Study of U(VI) Release Kinetics from Aquifer Sediments from a Former Uranium Mill Tailings Site (Rifle, Colorado, USA). AGUFM. 2007.1 indexed citations
12.
Davis, James, et al.. (2005). The Seven Habits of Effective Principal Preparation Programs.. Principal. 84(5). 18–21.7 indexed citations
13.
Davis, James, Michael F. Ochs, Markus Olin, Timothy E. Payne, & C.J. Tweed. (2005). Interpretation and prediction of radionuclide sorption onto substrates relevant for radioactive waste disposal using thermodynamic sorption models.4 indexed citations
14.
Davis, James, et al.. (2002). 1 A Genealogical Approach to Analyzing Post-Mortem Denial of Service Attacks. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).4 indexed citations
15.
Bargar, John, Christopher C. Fuller, & James Davis. (2002). Mechanism of Uranium Sorption by Apatite Materials from a Permeable Reactive Barrier Demonstration at Fry Canyon, Utah. AGUFM. 2002.1 indexed citations
Davis, James. (1997). The "Is-Ought" Fallacy and Musicology: The Assumptions of Pedagogy. Philosophy of Music Education Review. 5(1). 25–32.1 indexed citations
18.
Davis, James, et al.. (1985). Status report on factoring (at the Sandia National Labs). 183–215.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.