Gordon D. Fee
- Religious studies top 0.05%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 41
- Theology and Canon Law Studies 10
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 9
- Christian Theology and Mission 7
- Development top 5%
- Archeology top 2%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 4
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 19
- Religion, Society, and Development 2
- Classics top 10%
-
- Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods 2
Gordon D. Fee
33 papers receiving 339 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Religious studies 482
- Development 41
- Archeology 110
- Sociology and Political Science 289
- Classics 16
Countries citing papers authored by Gordon D. Fee
This map shows the geographic impact of Gordon D. Fee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gordon D. Fee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gordon D. Fee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gordon D. Fee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gordon D. Fee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gordon D. Fee. The network helps show where Gordon D. Fee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Gordon D. Fee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jesus the Lord according to Paul the Apostle: A Concise Introduction | 2018 | 0 |
| 2 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 4 | God's empowering presence | 2001 | 16 |
| 5 | To What End Exegesis?: Essays Textual, Exegetical, and Theological | 2001 | 4 |
| 6 | Romans and the people of God : essays in honor of Gordon D. Fee on the occasion of his 65th birthday | 1999 | 10 |
| 7 | 1996 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 9 | Gospel and Spirit: Issues in New Testament Hermeneutics | 1991 | 8 |
| 10 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 12 | How to read the Bible for all its worth : a guide to understanding the Bible | 1981 | 9 |
| 13 | Matthew 16: 2b-3 | 1981 | 1 |
| 14 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 16 | Modern textual criticism and the revival of the Textus receptus | 1978 | 1 |
| 17 | 1973 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1972 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1971 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1965 | 2 |
About Gordon D. Fee
Gordon D. Fee is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Classics and Development, having authored 51 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (41 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (19 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (10 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (9 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (7 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (2 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (482 citations), Development (41 citations), Archeology (110 citations), Sociology and Political Science (289 citations) and Classics (16 citations). Gordon D. Fee has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. K. Elliott, Eldon Jay Epp, William Baird, James D. G. Dunn, Bruce M. Metzger, N. T. Wright, William R. Farmer, Bart D. Ehrman and Michael W. Holmes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, New Testament Studies, Novum Testamentum, Pneuma and Theology Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.