William B. Lacy

2.1k total citations
65 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

William B. Lacy is a scholar working on Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, William B. Lacy has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Plant Science, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in William B. Lacy's work include Genetically Modified Organisms Research (10 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (4 papers). William B. Lacy is often cited by papers focused on Genetically Modified Organisms Research (10 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (4 papers). William B. Lacy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. William B. Lacy's co-authors include Lawrence Busch, Janet L. Bokemeier, Leland Glenna, Rick Welsh, Dina Biscotti, Joel M. Harris, Jon M. Shepard, Daryl E. Chubin, Gwilym Croucher and Richard Clayton and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Analytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

William B. Lacy

60 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William B. Lacy United States 20 239 201 199 172 150 65 1.4k
Robert D. Weaver United States 20 156 0.7× 125 0.6× 256 1.3× 40 0.2× 177 1.2× 110 1.3k
Maria Lee United Kingdom 18 62 0.3× 341 1.7× 41 0.2× 28 0.2× 72 0.5× 94 1.2k
Nicola Phillips United Kingdom 24 83 0.3× 558 2.8× 42 0.2× 15 0.1× 566 3.8× 60 1.7k
Gareth Edwards United Kingdom 16 74 0.3× 173 0.9× 118 0.6× 118 0.7× 83 0.6× 50 1.0k
Robert J. Nash United States 19 102 0.4× 492 2.4× 23 0.1× 299 1.7× 81 0.5× 92 1.4k
Michael Hill United States 14 106 0.4× 164 0.8× 4 0.0× 105 0.6× 55 0.4× 38 1.8k
Stephen K. Sanderson United States 21 32 0.1× 707 3.5× 23 0.1× 67 0.4× 35 0.2× 70 1.6k
V. James Rhodes United States 18 56 0.2× 107 0.5× 101 0.5× 513 3.0× 158 1.1× 68 1.1k
Catherine Montgomery United Kingdom 22 32 0.1× 254 1.3× 8 0.0× 900 5.2× 17 0.1× 71 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by William B. Lacy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William B. Lacy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William B. Lacy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William B. Lacy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William B. Lacy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William B. Lacy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William B. Lacy. The network helps show where William B. Lacy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William B. Lacy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William B. Lacy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William B. Lacy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William B. Lacy. William B. Lacy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Croucher, Gwilym & William B. Lacy. (2020). Perspectives of Australian higher education leadership: convergent or divergent views and implications for the future?. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 42(4). 516–529. 13 indexed citations
2.
Croucher, Gwilym & William B. Lacy. (2020). The emergence of academic capitalism and university neoliberalism: perspectives of Australian higher education leadership. Higher Education. 83(2). 279–295. 27 indexed citations
3.
Glenna, Leland, Rick Welsh, David E. Ervin, William B. Lacy, & Dina Biscotti. (2011). Commercial science, scientists’ values, and university biotechnology research agendas. Research Policy. 40(7). 957–968. 55 indexed citations
4.
Welsh, Rick, Leland Glenna, William B. Lacy, & Dina Biscotti. (2008). Close Enough but Not Too Far. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ervin, David E., Terri L. Lomax, Steven T. Buccola, et al.. (2002). University-Industry Relationships: Framing the Issues for Academic Research in Agricultural Biotechnology. PDXScholar (Portland State University). 8 indexed citations
6.
Lacy, William B.. (2000). Empowering Communities Through Public Work, Science, and Local Food Systems: Revisiting Democracy and Globalization*. Rural Sociology. 65(1). 3–26. 63 indexed citations
7.
Lacy, William B., et al.. (1999). Quantitative SERS Measurements on Dielectric-Overcoated Silver-Island Films by Solution-Deposition Control of Surface Concentrations. Analytical Chemistry. 71(13). 2564–2570. 37 indexed citations
8.
Brush, Stephen B., et al.. (1997). Making Nature, Shaping Culture: Plant Biodiversity in Global Context.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 26(2). 202–202. 8 indexed citations
9.
Lacy, William B.. (1994). Biodiversity, cultural diversity, and food equity. Agriculture and Human Values. 11(1). 3–9. 8 indexed citations
10.
Hearn, Jeff, et al.. (1993). Victim & offender : mediation handbook. 2 indexed citations
11.
Schueler, Paula A., et al.. (1993). Physical structure, optical resonance, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering of silver-island films on suspended polymer latex particles. Analytical Chemistry. 65(22). 3177–3186. 61 indexed citations
12.
Lacy, William B., Lawrence Busch, & Alessandro Bonanno. (1989). Ciencia, tecnología y reestructuración de la agricultura. Agricultura y sociedad. 73–103.
13.
Busch, Lawrence, Alessandro Bonanno, & William B. Lacy. (1989). SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE RESTRUCTURING OF AGRICULTURE. Sociologia Ruralis. 29(2). 118–130. 13 indexed citations
14.
Busch, Lawrence & William B. Lacy. (1986). The Agricultural Scientific Enterprise: A System In Transition. 21 indexed citations
15.
Lacy, William B., Janet L. Bokemeier, & Jon M. Shepard. (1983). JOB ATTRIBUTE PREFERENCES AND WORK COMMITMENT OF MEN AND WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES. Personnel Psychology. 36(2). 315–329. 111 indexed citations
16.
Lacy, William B. & Lawrence Busch. (1982). Guardians of Science: Journals and Journal Editors in the Agricultural Sciences.. Rural Sociology. 47(3). 10 indexed citations
17.
Lacy, William B.. (1981). The Influence of Attitudes and Current Friends on Drug Use Intentions. The Journal of Social Psychology. 113(1). 65–76. 17 indexed citations
18.
Lacy, William B.. (1980). Clients, Colleagues, and Colleges: Perceived Influences on Extension Agents.. Rural Sociology. 45(3). 469–482. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pigg, Kenneth E., Lawrence Busch, & William B. Lacy. (1980). Learning Styles in Adult Education: a Study of County Extension Agents. Adult Education. 30(4). 233–244. 33 indexed citations
20.
Lacy, William B. & Jon Hendricks. (1980). Developmental Models of Adult Life: Myth or Reality. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 11(2). 89–110. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026