William Austin
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Safety Research top 5%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Papers in
-
- Psychology of Social Influence 5
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 4
- Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse 2
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 2
-
- Emotions and Moral Behavior 2
- Co-authors
- Elaine Walster (3 shared papers)Thomas A. Williams (2 shared papers)Jeffrey S. Friedman (2 shared papers)James R. Flens (2 shared papers)Stephen Worchel (1 shared paper)Daniël J. Siegel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (3 papers)Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2 papers)Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2 papers)Law and Human Behavior (2 papers)Journal of Personality (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
William Austin
15 papers receiving 525 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- General Decision Sciences 49
- Safety Research 137
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 166
- Social Psychology 206
- Sociology and Political Science 338
Countries citing papers authored by William Austin
This map shows the geographic impact of William Austin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Austin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Austin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Austin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Austin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Austin. The network helps show where William Austin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside William Austin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1974 | 144 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 112 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1980 | 65 | |
| 5 | 1974 | 54 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 52 | |
| 7 | 1977 | 36 | |
| 8 | 1979 | 32 | |
| 9 | 1977 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1978 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1974 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 2 |
About William Austin
William Austin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 605 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Social Influence (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (49 citations), Safety Research (137 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (166 citations), Social Psychology (206 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (338 citations). William Austin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Elaine Walster, Thomas A. Williams, Jeffrey S. Friedman, James R. Flens, Stephen Worchel and Daniël J. Siegel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Law and Human Behavior and Journal of Personality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.