W. Steijn

26 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

W. Steijn
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 53
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 55
  • Chemical Health and Safety 5
  • Communication 34
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 7
Replace Zhaopeng Liu with:
Zhaopeng Liu China
Carol Paris United States
Simon N. Leonard Australia
Rebecca M. Pliske United States
Jasmine L. Duran United States
Thomas Loveday Australia
Charlene K. Stokes United States
Oronzo Parlangeli Italy
Michael Letsky United States
Esther Oprins Netherlands
W. Steijn relative to Zhaopeng Liu China Zhaopeng Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Zhaopeng Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Steijn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Steijn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Steijn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Steijn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Steijn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Steijn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Steijn. The network helps show where W. Steijn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Steijn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Steijn Line = papers co-authored together W. Steijn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201339
2 201131
3 201630
4 201528
5 201924
6 201421
7 202220
8 201615
9 202014
10 201112
11 20157
12 20166
13 20235
14 20203
15 20173
16 20153
17 20192
18 20232
19 20192
20 20232

About W. Steijn

W. Steijn is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 26 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Safety Research (12 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (9 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (53 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (55 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (5 citations), Communication (34 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (7 citations). W. Steijn has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Schouten, Anton Vedder, Julian Elliott, Iro Xenidou‐Dervou, Wilma C. M. Resing, Vincent H. Hildebrandt, Claire M. Bernaards, Ingrid Hendriksen, Jop Groeneweg and Pieter van Gelder. Their work appears in journals such as Safety Science, Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Information Polity and Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact