Information Polity

552 papers and 7.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 552 papers published in Information Polity in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Information Polity usually cover Political Science and International Relations (348 papers), Communication (191 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (170 papers) specifically the topics of E-Government and Public Services (300 papers), Social Media and Politics (175 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Polity are Albert Meijer, J. Ramón Gil-García, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Frank Bannister, Richard Heeks, Marijn Janssen, Soon Ae Chun, Theresa A. Pardo, Arthur Edwards and Ines Mergel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Information Polity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Polity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Polity.

Countries where authors publish in Information Polity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Polity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Polity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Polity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025