Charlene K. Stokes
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Safety Research top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Joseph B. LyonsMarissa McCoyMonika LohaniSusan E. RiversIolanda LeiteNicole SalomonsTamera R. SchneiderBrian Scassellati
- Topics
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (7 papers)Social Robot Interaction and HRI (5 papers)Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers)
- Journals
- Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyAnxiety Stress & CopingMilitary Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Charlene K. Stokes
16 papers receiving 397 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Social Psychology 300
- Artificial Intelligence 92
- Safety Research 52
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
- Cognitive Neuroscience 41
Countries citing papers authored by Charlene K. Stokes
This map shows the geographic impact of Charlene K. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlene K. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlene K. Stokes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charlene K. Stokes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlene K. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlene K. Stokes. The network helps show where Charlene K. Stokes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charlene K. Stokes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charlene K. Stokes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charlene K. Stokes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charlene K. Stokes. Charlene K. Stokes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suspicion, Trust, and Automation | 6 |
| 2 | 34 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 74 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 86 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | Adaptive Performance: An Examination of Convergent and Predictive Validity | 6 |
| 17 | 0 |
About Charlene K. Stokes
Charlene K. Stokes is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (7 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (5 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (300 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (35 citations) and Safety Research (52 citations). Charlene K. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Joseph B. Lyons, Marissa McCoy, Monika Lohani, Susan E. Rivers, Iolanda Leite, Nicole Salomons, Tamera R. Schneider, Brian Scassellati, Daniel Ullman and Kevin J. Eschleman. Their work appears in journals such as Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Anxiety Stress & Coping and Military Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.