W. Keith Schilit
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Edwin A. LockeFrank T. Paine
- Topics
- Private Equity and Venture Capital (8 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers)Management Theory and Practice (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
W. Keith Schilit
18 papers receiving 454 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 201
- Accounting 191
- Strategy and Management 172
- Sociology and Political Science 83
- Finance 82
Countries citing papers authored by W. Keith Schilit
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Keith Schilit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Keith Schilit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Keith Schilit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Keith Schilit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Keith Schilit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Keith Schilit. The network helps show where W. Keith Schilit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Keith Schilit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Keith Schilit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Keith Schilit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Keith Schilit. W. Keith Schilit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 125 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Blue Chips & Hot Tips: Identifying Emerging Growth Companies Most Likely to Succeed | 1 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Dream Makers and Deal Breakers: Inside the Venture Capital Industry | 13 |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | The Entrepreneur's Guide to Preparing a Winning Business Plan and Raising Venture Capital | 5 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 90 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | A study of upward influence in functional strategic decisions | 2 |
| 19 | 186 |
About W. Keith Schilit
W. Keith Schilit is a scholar working on Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Private Equity and Venture Capital (8 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers) and Management Theory and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (201 citations), Accounting (191 citations) and Strategy and Management (172 citations). W. Keith Schilit has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edwin A. Locke and Frank T. Paine. Their work appears in journals such as Administrative Science Quarterly, Journal of Management Studies and Human Relations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.