Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value
2005728 citationsVladimir Pucik et al.Strategic Management Journalprofile →
Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective.
Countries citing papers authored by Vladimir Pucik
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Vladimir Pucik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vladimir Pucik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vladimir Pucik more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vladimir Pucik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vladimir Pucik. The network helps show where Vladimir Pucik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vladimir Pucik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vladimir Pucik.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vladimir Pucik based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Vladimir Pucik. Vladimir Pucik is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pucik, Vladimir, Ingmar Björkman, Paul Evans, & Günter K. Stahl. (2014). Human resource management in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. WU Research. 119–152.7 indexed citations
3.
Pucik, Vladimir, Paul Evans, & Ingmar Björkman. (2011). The Global Challenge: International Human Resource Management.94 indexed citations
4.
Pucik, Vladimir, et al.. (2011). The Global Challenge : International Human Resource Management-Second Edition.1 indexed citations
5.
Pucik, Vladimir. (2006). R&D spending, domestic competition, and export performance of Japanese manufacturing firms. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).12 indexed citations
6.
Evans, Paul, Vladimir Pucik, & Jean‐Louis Barsoux. (2006). The global challenge : frameworks for international human resource management. McGraw-Hill eBooks.213 indexed citations
7.
Pucik, Vladimir, et al.. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal. 26(6). 555–575.728 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Xin, Katherine & Vladimir Pucik. (2003). Trouble in Paradise. Harvard business review. 81(8). 27–35.4 indexed citations
9.
Pucik, Vladimir & Katherine Xin. (2003). Problemas en el paraíso. Harvard business review. 81(8). 21–30.
10.
Pucik, Vladimir, et al.. (2002). The Global Challenge.120 indexed citations
Pucik, Vladimir & Tania Saba. (1998). Selecting and Developing the Global versus the Expatriate Manager: A Review of the State-of-the-Art. 21(4). 40–41.42 indexed citations
Pucik, Vladimir, Noel M. Tichy, & Carole K. Barnett. (1993). Globalizing management : creating and leading the competitive organization. John Wiley eBooks.92 indexed citations
15.
Pucik, Vladimir. (1991). Revolution or Evolution: The Transformation of Japanese Personnel Practices. eCommons (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.