Veit Kubik

570 total citations
33 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

Veit Kubik is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Veit Kubik has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Veit Kubik's work include Memory Processes and Influences (18 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (6 papers). Veit Kubik is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (18 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (6 papers). Veit Kubik collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and United States. Veit Kubik's co-authors include Fredrik U. Jönsson, Robert Gaschler, Monika Knopf, Lars‐Göran Nilsson, Tobias Tempel, Timo Mäntylä, Hedvig Söderlund, Jonas Olofsson, Bert Jonsson and Martin Riemer and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Veit Kubik

30 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Veit Kubik Germany 13 193 132 106 66 61 33 301
Michele Scaltritti Italy 13 303 1.6× 246 1.9× 112 1.1× 54 0.8× 33 0.5× 37 444
Serje Robidoux Australia 12 168 0.9× 222 1.7× 53 0.5× 31 0.5× 12 0.2× 34 321
Carola Wiklund‐Hörnqvist Sweden 10 218 1.1× 127 1.0× 94 0.9× 53 0.8× 30 0.5× 21 351
Elizabeth M. Clerkin United States 3 112 0.6× 212 1.6× 50 0.5× 41 0.6× 35 0.6× 6 314
Michael J. Stroud United States 9 331 1.7× 201 1.5× 120 1.1× 67 1.0× 48 0.8× 19 469
Menahem Yeari Israel 11 207 1.1× 153 1.2× 85 0.8× 42 0.6× 40 0.7× 26 363
Brandon Roy United States 10 49 0.3× 219 1.7× 89 0.8× 133 2.0× 24 0.4× 16 382
Noah D. Forrin Canada 11 246 1.3× 105 0.8× 80 0.8× 50 0.8× 55 0.9× 20 321
Sara D. Davis United States 10 252 1.3× 99 0.8× 81 0.8× 92 1.4× 82 1.3× 17 315
Kalif E. Vaughn United States 10 225 1.2× 155 1.2× 90 0.8× 120 1.8× 37 0.6× 16 303

Countries citing papers authored by Veit Kubik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Veit Kubik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Veit Kubik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veit Kubik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Veit Kubik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Veit Kubik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Veit Kubik. The network helps show where Veit Kubik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Veit Kubik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Veit Kubik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Veit Kubik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Veit Kubik. Veit Kubik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Opitz, Bertram & Veit Kubik. (2024). Far transfer of retrieval-practice benefits: rule-based learning as the underlying mechanism. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 9(1). 1 indexed citations
2.
Aslan, Alp & Veit Kubik. (2024). Buildup and release from proactive interference: The forward testing effect in children’s spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 240. 105838–105838.
3.
Kubik, Veit, et al.. (2023). Delayed Metacomprehension Judgments Do Not Directly Improve Learning from Texts. Journal of Intelligence. 11(7). 150–150. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hahne, Florian, et al.. (2023). Multitasking in Complex Environments: An Attempt to Generalize Individual Differences in Multitasking to a Realistic Task Setting. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 67(1). 2346–2352.
5.
Kubik, Veit, et al.. (2023). Can prompts improve self-explaining an online video lecture? Yes, but do not disturb!. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 20(1). 15–15. 12 indexed citations
6.
Fandakova, Yana, Andrea Kiesel, Veit Kubik, et al.. (2022). Individual differences fill the uncharted intersections between cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in multitasking.. Psychological Review. 129(6). 1486–1494. 7 indexed citations
7.
Kubik, Veit, et al.. (2022). Metacognitive judgments can potentiate new learning: The role of covert retrieval. Metacognition and Learning. 17(3). 1057–1077. 13 indexed citations
8.
Kubik, Veit, et al.. (2022). The underconfidence-with-practice effect in action memory: The contribution of retrieval practice to metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning. 17(2). 375–398. 6 indexed citations
9.
Morimoto, Koichi, et al.. (2021). Age of smile: a cross-cultural replication report of Ganel and Goodale (2018). PubMed. 5(1). 1–15. 7 indexed citations
10.
Kubik, Veit, Fabio Del Missier, & Timo Mäntylä. (2020). Spatial ability contributes to memory for delayed intentions. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 5(1). 36–36. 4 indexed citations
11.
Gaschler, Robert, et al.. (2020). Online Quizzes with Closed Questions in Formal Assessment: How Elaborate Feedback can Promote Learning. Psychology Learning & Teaching. 20(1). 91–106. 24 indexed citations
12.
Riemer, Martin, Veit Kubik, & Thomas Wolbers. (2019). The effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior. Behavioural Brain Research. 369. 111929–111929. 16 indexed citations
13.
Kubik, Veit, Fredrik U. Jönsson, Monika Knopf, & Wolfgang Mack. (2018). The Direct Testing Effect Is Pervasive in Action Memory: Analyses of Recall Accuracy and Recall Speed. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1632–1632. 9 indexed citations
14.
Kubik, Veit, et al.. (2018). Spatial offloading in multiple task monitoring. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 30(2). 230–241. 7 indexed citations
15.
Mäntylä, Timo, et al.. (2017). Time takes space: selective effects of multitasking on concurrent spatial processing. Cognitive Processing. 18(3). 229–235. 8 indexed citations
16.
Tempel, Tobias & Veit Kubik. (2016). Test-potentiated learning of motor sequences. Memory. 25(3). 326–334. 14 indexed citations
17.
Kubik, Veit, Hedvig Söderlund, Lars‐Göran Nilsson, & Fredrik U. Jönsson. (2014). Individual and Combined Effects of Enactment and Testing on Memory for Action Phrases. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie). 61(5). 347–355. 22 indexed citations
18.
Jönsson, Fredrik U., et al.. (2013). How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?. Psychological Research. 78(5). 623–633. 24 indexed citations
19.
Kubik, Veit, et al.. (2012). Study for now, but judge for later: Delayed judgments of learning promote long‐term retention. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 53(6). 450–454. 6 indexed citations
20.
Kubik, Veit, et al.. (2011). Exploring the enactment effect from an information processing view: What can we learn from serial position analyses?. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 52(6). 509–515. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026